The optimal design of negative stiffness inerter passive dampers for structures
International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, ISSN: 0020-7403, Vol: 258, Page: 108551
2023
- 19Citations
- 9Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The combination of negative stiffness devices and inerters to traditional base isolators (TBI) and tuned mass dampers (TMD) does not exist in any state-of-the-art. Therefore, to pursue the research using the above-mentioned research scope, the negative stiffness inerter passive dampers such as negative stiffness inerter-based base isolators (NSIBI), negative stiffness base isolators (NSBI), negative stiffness inerter-based tuned mass dampers (NSITMD), and negative stiffness tuned mass dampers (NSTMD) are introduced in this paper. H2 and H∞ optimization methods are applied to derive the exact closed-form expressions for the optimal design parameters of these novel passive vibration dampers. Newton’s second law applies to derive the governing equations of motion of the controlled structures. The transfer function formation and Newmark-beta method are applied to determine the dynamic responses of the controlled structures analytically and numerically. Hence, H2 optimized NSIBI and NSBI have 45.98% and 46.71% more dynamic response reduction capacities than optimum TBI. In addition, H∞ optimized NSIBI and NSBI have 58.36% and 57.32% more dynamic response reduction capacities than optimum TBI. Furthermore, the optimum NSITMD and NSTMD have 0.42%, 10.84%, and 4.5%, 13.48% more dynamic response reduction capacities than traditional TMD. All the derivations are mathematically accurate.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020740323004538; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.108551; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85162902256&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0020740323004538; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.108551
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know