Internal-interfacial cracking interaction: Combined phase-field and discontinuous Galerkin/cohesive zone modeling
International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, ISSN: 0020-7403, Vol: 273, Page: 109211
2024
- 4Citations
- 9Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Interaction simulations between internal and interfacial cracks arising in laminated composites have remained a challenging task in the computational mechanics community. Toward this end, this paper proposes a novel explicit approach that combines a length scale-insensitive phase-field model and a discontinuous Galerkin/cohesive zone model to respectively account for brittle or cohesive fracture of bulk materials and interfacial debonding. The presented approach advocates the incorporation of a discontinuous Galerkin term to overcome the artificial compliance problem inherent in existing phase-field methods that normally adopt intrinsic cohesive zone models for interfacial debonding. The capacity of our approach is further exploited by innovatively integrating the approach with an efficient six-node pentahedral solid-shell element, enabling a natural simulation of through-thickness cracks in thin shell structures with high-aspect-ratio elements. Implementation challenge, arising from the stress decomposition of the solid-shell element, of such integration is well addressed. In light of the considerable computational cost required for a phase-field-based method, the proposed approach is mapped to graphics processing units to improve the computational efficiency. Representative numerical examples have demonstrated the capability of the proposed approach in simulating mode-I and mixed-mode cohesive cracks, as well as brittle fractures in solids and shells. It is also shown that the presented approach is capable of effectively addressing the artificial compliance issue and capturing the competitive behavior between internal and interfacial cracks in a physically consistent manner.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020740324002534; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2024.109211; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85189553161&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0020740324002534; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2024.109211
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know