Quality and readability of online information on dental treatment for snoring and obstructive sleep apnea
International Journal of Medical Informatics, ISSN: 1386-5056, Vol: 133, Page: 104000
2020
- 13Citations
- 36Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations13
- Citation Indexes13
- 13
- CrossRef2
- Captures36
- Readers36
- 36
Article Description
To evaluate quality and readability of online information on dental treatment for snoring and obstructive sleep apnea. An Internet search was done using three engines (Bing, Google, and Yahoo) with the combination of terms, “snoring sleep apnea dental treatment”. The first 100 sites from the search of each engine were screened. Subject sites were evaluated with Health on the Net(HON) criteria, Journal of American Medical Association(JAMA) benchmarks, DISCERN, Ensuring Quality Information for Patients(EQIP), Flesch-Kincaid Grade level and Flesch Reading Ease(FRE) score. One hundred and thirty websites were evaluated. The HON, DISCERN, EQIP, and FRE score were each 39.4%, 47.3%, 49.7%, and 51.6% of the maximum possible score, respectively. According to JAMA benchmarks fewer than 50% of the sites displayed attribution and currency. There was only one site displaying the HON seal. HON score, DISCERN score and EQIP score showed significant inter-correlation. Based on this study, the current quality and readability of searchable websites on dental treatment for snoring and sleep apnea are low and poorly maintained on average. Clinicians should be able to evaluate and give accurate online information on this issue to patients.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386505618307287; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.104000; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85074760203&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31731221; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1386505618307287; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.104000
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know