Dynamics of evaporating respiratory droplets in the vicinity of vortex dipoles
International Journal of Multiphase Flow, ISSN: 0301-9322, Vol: 148, Page: 103901
2022
- 13Citations
- 11Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
A new mathematical analysis of exhaled respiratory droplet dynamics and settling distances in the vicinity of vortical environments is presented. Recent experimental and theoretical studies suggest that vortical flow structures may enhance the settling distances of exhaled respiratory droplets beyond the two-meter distancing rule recommended by health authorities lately. We propose a mathematical framework to study the underlying physical mechanism responsible for the entrapment and subsequently delayed settling times of evaporating droplets and solid particles. A dipolar vortex is considered self-propelling through a cloud of micron-sized evaporating droplets. This configuration might be utilized to approximate an indoor environment in which similar unsteady vortical flow structures interact with exhaled respiratory droplets. We demonstrate the vortex dipole effect on droplet and solid particles settling distances, depending on the evaporation rate, the vorticity of the dipole, and the droplet’s initial diameter and location relative to the vortex core. Our theoretical analysis reveals non-intuitive interactions between the vortex dipole, droplet relaxation time, gravity, and mass transfer. The existence of optimal conditions for maximum displacement is suggested, where the droplet entrainment reaches up to an order of magnitude larger than the vortex core length scale. We present a basic model that may be applied for evaluating the spread of exhaled respiratory droplets in vortical environments. Our theoretical study suggests that exhaled respiratory droplets initially at rest can translate to significant distances, hence implying that vortical flow might enhance the transmission of airborne pathogens.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301932221003128; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2021.103901; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85122649678&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0301932221003128; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2021.103901
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know