Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Thai version of Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory Version 4.c
International Journal of Nursing Sciences, ISSN: 2352-0132, Vol: 10, Issue: 3, Page: 332-344
2023
- 8Citations
- 118Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations8
- Citation Indexes8
- Captures118
- Readers118
- 118
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- News1
Most Recent News
Walailak University Researchers Detail Research in Chronic Disease (Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Thai version of Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory Version 4.c)
2023 AUG 15 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Health & Medicine Daily -- Investigators discuss new findings in chronic disease. According
Article Description
To translate and validate the Thai Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory version 4.c (Thai SC-CII v4.c) in individuals with chronic illnesses. A scale translation and cross-sectional validation study was conducted. The English version was translated for Thai involved nine steps: preparation, forward translation, reconciliation, back-translation, back-translation review, harmonization, cognitive debriefing, review of cognitive debriefing and finalization, and proofreading. A cross-sectional study was conducted from July to November 2022 at 16 primary care centers in southern Thailand, involving 410 participants with at least one chronic condition. Validity assessments included structural, convergent, and discriminant validity. Concurrent validity examined correlations between SC-CII v4.c with the Self-Care Self-Efficacy Scale (SCSES) and self-perceived health. Internal coherence reliability was calculated using Cronbach’s α coefficient, item-total correlation coefficients, and the composite reliability (CR) index. Thai SC-CII v4.c demonstrated excellent translational validity (κ = 0.99). The specified Self-Care Maintenance model fit well, with minor differences in health promoting behavior and illness-related behavior items compared to the original model. The original Self-Care Monitoring, and Self-Care Management models fit well with Thai data. Simultaneous confirmatory factor analysis confirmed a satisfactory fit of the full SC-CII v4.c. Convergent validity had partial support (average variance extracted = 0.23–0.51), and discriminant validity was established (heterotrait-monotrait ratios = 0.37–0.88). Concurrent validity was supported by positive correlations between each scale and overall SC-CII v.4c with SCSES ( r = 0.25–0.65) and self-perceived health ( r = 0.09–0.35). The Cronbach’s α coefficient were adequate for all scales except the Self-Care Maintenance scale (Cronbach’s α = 0.68), but the CR estimate improved the reliability of all three scales (ranging 0.80–0.82). All items had satisfactory item-total correlation coefficients (ranging 0.34–0.71), except the one pertaining to sleep. The Thai SC-CII v4.c is valid and reliable for assessing self-care in various chronic illnesses. Further testing is recommended for patients with specific diseases.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352013223000753; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2023.06.019; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85165322061&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37545777; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2352013223000753; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2023.06.019
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know