Text messaging interventions for breastfeeding outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
International Journal of Nursing Studies, ISSN: 0020-7489, Vol: 150, Page: 104647
2024
- 6Citations
- 59Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations6
- Citation Indexes6
- Captures59
- Readers59
- 58
Review Description
Given the health benefits of breastfeeding for infants and mothers, breastfeeding has become a significant public health issue. The global growth of mobile phone usage has created new options for breastfeeding promotion, including text messaging. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of text messaging interventions on breastfeeding outcomes and to identify the efficacy moderators of such interventions. Ten electronic databases were searched from the inception of the databases to 5 July 2023. Studies were included if they used randomized controlled trials or quasi-experimental designs to evaluate the effect of text messaging interventions on breastfeeding outcomes. Two reviewers screened the included studies, assessed the risk of bias, and extracted the data. Pooled results were obtained by the random-effects model, and subgroup analyses were conducted on intervention characteristics to identify potential moderators. The protocol of this study was registered on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42022371311). Sixteen studies were included. Text messaging interventions could improve the exclusive breastfeeding rate (at < 3 months: OR = 2.04; 95 % CI: 1.60–2.60, P < 0.001; at 3–6 months: OR = 1.66; 95 % CI: 1.18–2.33, P = 0.004; at ≥ 6 months: OR = 2.13; 95 % CI: 1.47–3.08, P < 0.001), and the breastfeeding self-efficacy (SMD = 0.30, 95 % CI: 0.14–0.45, P < 0.001). Text messaging interventions that covered antenatal and postnatal periods, delivered weekly were most effective in improving the exclusive breastfeeding rate. Text messaging interventions may improve breastfeeding practice compared with no or general health information. We suggest text messaging conducted from the pre- to postnatal periods in a weekly manner can effectively increase exclusive breastfeeding rates and breastfeeding self-efficacy. Further studies should investigate the relation between new theories (such as the health action process approach and the theory of message-framing) and efficacy of breastfeeding interventions, using text components.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020748923002122; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104647; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85178639484&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38056353; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0020748923002122; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104647
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know