Joint price and quality optimization strategy in crowdfunding campaign
International Journal of Production Economics, ISSN: 0925-5273, Vol: 263, Page: 108919
2023
- 3Citations
- 19Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This paper considers a scenario where a creator uses crowdfunding to raise funds, and after successfully implementing the project, he will further sell products in spot market. We jointly optimize price and product quality to maximize the long-term benefits of the creator. Our analysis first reveals that, beyond the financing advantage, the creator can also obtain premium in crowdfunding through price discrimination, which explains why prices of many products on Kickstarter are reduced in spot market. Second, we find over-investment happens because higher product quality can increase price discrimination level, which is affected by the capital constraint level and product attributes. Our analysis also suggests that crowdfunding increases total consumer surplus, yet this outcome results from two competing effects–the positive effect of larger market coverage and the negative effect of price discrimination. Moreover, we reveal the difference in change direction between individual consumer surplus and total consumer surplus. In extensions, we investigate how the creator can respond to consumers’ strategic waiting behavior and moral hazard. We further study how the price commitment and deferred payment mechanism can improve crowdfunding performance regarding consumers’ strategic behavior and moral hazard, respectively.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527323001512; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108919; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85161676985&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0925527323001512; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108919
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know