How to define the experimental conditions of skin permeation assays for drugs presenting biopharmaceutical limitations? The experience with testosterone
International Journal of Pharmaceutics, ISSN: 0378-5173, Vol: 607, Page: 120987
2021
- 10Citations
- 21Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations10
- Citation Indexes10
- 10
- CrossRef4
- Captures21
- Readers21
- 21
Review Description
Cutaneous permeation assays are crucial to attest the performance or bioequivalence of topical or transdermal products. Although the official guidelines (e.g., FDA/EMA) play a key role in harmonizing the experimental design, alternative methods are often proposed by the scientific community, which makes it difficult to compare results from different studies. In this review, permeation assays with testosterone (TST) were selected to show this high variability in drug transport rate. The main sources of variation discussed were tissue thickness, animal model, donor and receptor fluid constitution, type of solubilizing agent used in aqueous fluids, drug concentration, degree of supersaturation, skin lipid content, number of experimental times and the physical–chemical stability of the molecule in test fluids. This variation becomes even more critical for molecules that present biopharmaceutical limitations such as TST. In addition, the skin presents specific receptors for this hormone due to its physiological action in this region of the body, which makes the evaluation of the TST transport rate in this tissue even more challenging. The impact of each experimental parameter mentioned above on the flux or permeation coefficient of TST is discussed in detail in the review. Assays used to evaluate tissue integrity are also presented.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378517321007936; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120987; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85113243694&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34389422; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378517321007936; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120987
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know