A machine learning framework for predicting entrapment efficiency in niosomal particles
International Journal of Pharmaceutics, ISSN: 0378-5173, Vol: 627, Page: 122203
2022
- 11Citations
- 13Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations11
- Citation Indexes11
- 11
- CrossRef7
- Captures13
- Readers13
- 13
Article Description
Niosomes are vesicles formed mostly by nonionic surfactant and cholesterol incorporation as an excipient. The drug entrapment efficiency of niosomal vesicles is particularly important and depends on many parameters. Changing the effective parameters to have maximum entrapment efficiency in the laboratory is time-consuming and costly. In this study, a machine learning framework was proposed to address these problems. In order to find the most critical parameter affecting the entrapment efficiency and its optimal value in a specific experiment, data were first extracted from articles of the last decade using keywords of niosome and thin-film hydration method. Then, deep neural network (DNN), linear regression, and polynomial regression models were trained with four cost functions. Afterward, the most influential parameter on entrapment efficiency was determined using the sensitivity experiment. Finally, the optimal point of the most influential parameter was found by keeping the other parameters constant and changing the most influential parameter. The veracity of this test was evaluated by entrapment efficiency results of 7 niosomal formulations containing doxycycline hyclate prepared in the laboratory. The best model was DNN, which yielded root mean square error (RMSE) of 13.587 ± 2.61, mean absolute error (MAE) of 10.17 ± 1.421, and R-squared ( R2 ) of 0.763 ± 0.1 evaluated by 5-fold cross-validation. The hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB) was identified as the most influential parameter, and the entrapment efficiency change curve was plotted versus the HLB value. This study uses machine learning methods to synthesize niosomal systems with optimal entrapment efficiency at a lower cost and time.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378517322007578; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.122203; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85138205772&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36116690; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378517322007578; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.122203
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know