Analytic model of dislocation density evolution in fcc polycrystals accounting for dislocation generation, storage, and dynamic recovery mechanisms
International Journal of Plasticity, ISSN: 0749-6419, Vol: 151, Page: 103178
2022
- 49Citations
- 37Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
An analytic model of the evolution of dislocation density in fcc polycrystals is described. The evolution equations approximately account for most known dislocation storage, dynamic recovery, and dislocation generation mechanisms in fcc polycrystals. Specifically, the model incorporates network (forest) and grain boundary storage, mobile-network and mobile–mobile annihilation, screw–screw annihilation via athermal and thermal single cross-slip, generation by double cross-slip (Koehler mechanism, including dipole formation), Frank-Read sources, grain boundary nucleation, and mobile–immobile dislocation nucleation due to shock loading. Single cross-slip is assumed to proceed through the Friedel–Escaig (FE) mechanism; the corresponding activation energy is calculated using a modified FE model. The activation energy for double cross-slip is calculated for the first time by extending the FE model. The exact evolution equations are integro-differential equations, and as such are difficult to implement in a code; hence, the evolution equations are simplified by making several approximations. Preliminary results on copper are presented, including comparisons to experimental data.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749641921002448; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2021.103178; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85123030460&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0749641921002448; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2021.103178
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know