Rate controlling deformation mechanisms in SS316L stainless steel manufactured using laser powder bed fusion technique
International Journal of Plasticity, ISSN: 0749-6419, Vol: 171, Page: 103787
2023
- 7Citations
- 19Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
We conducted uniaxial tensile strain rate jump tests to account for the strain rate controlling mechanisms in the additively manufactured SS316L stainless steel. Special emphasis is placed on the role of high dislocation density and chemical segregation on dictating the rate sensitive behavior. Lowest strain rate sensitivity is found, despite the highest dislocation density in the as build state, which signified the role of solute segregation at cell walls in increasing the activation volume and forms the strong basis for rejecting dislocation forest as the strain rate controlling obstacles. Consistent increase in the strain rate sensitivity with annealing is found consistent with the chemical homogenisation of the solutes causing smaller inter-obstacle spacing causing decreasing activation volume. Experimental findings are supported by CALPHAD simulations and mechanical threshold stress (MTS) modelling framework. Significant difference between the instantaneous and steady state rate sensitivity is understood using the dynamic pileup dislocation density readjustment mechanism causing considerable flow transient while adjusting the mobile dislocation density on strain rate change in the presence of solute decorated dislocation cells. Present investigation helps in gaining newer insights into the deformation mechanisms of the additively manufactured alloys featuring cellular microstructures.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749641923002711; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2023.103787; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85175317348&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0749641923002711; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2023.103787
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know