The cost-effectiveness of targeted screening for congenital cytomegalovirus in newborns compared to clinical diagnosis in the US
International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, ISSN: 0165-5876, Vol: 166, Page: 111450
2023
- 5Citations
- 16Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Most Recent News
New Findings from Emory University in Cytomegalovirus Provides New Insights (The Cost-effectiveness of Targeted Screening for Congenital Cytomegalovirus In Newborns Compared To Clinical Diagnosis In the Us)
2023 APR 06 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Health & Medicine Daily -- Investigators discuss new findings in Herpesvirus Diseases and
Article Description
Congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) is the leading environmental cause of hearing loss (HL) among children, affecting four in one thousand newborns. cCMV testing in the US is currently based on clinical diagnosis which does not consistently identify cCMV cases and precludes early intervention to prevent and reduce the severity of HL. We estimated the cost-effectiveness of targeted newborn screening and cCMV testing among newborns compared to clinical diagnosis. We use a decision-analytic model to estimate the costs of preventing HL progression, of additional cases of severe HL, of identifying a case of HL one year earlier, and of identifying an additional case of cCMV, through targeted screening and cCMV testing for infants failing two newborn hearing screens with follow-up to age five. We also estimate the costs of nationwide implementation of a newborn screening and testing program. Model pathways were based on best practices for screening, testing, and treatment. Probabilities were drawn from the published literature; costs were estimated based on Medicare reimbursement rates. Probabilistic and scenario analyses were conducted to determine the robustness of results. Targeted testing and cCMV screening, compared to standard of care, cost an additional $2.96 (±2.26) per infant screened and identified 0.00038 (±0.00022) cases of HL, 3.8 in 10000 children, at a cost of $8197 (±4217) per case of HL identified. Implementing targeted screening for all children in the US was estimated to cost $193,229. Although cases numbers are small, our model shows that targeted newborn screening and cCMV testing reduced cases of HL progression. Adoption of newborn targeted screening as standard of care should be considered given it may prevent disability at very low cost.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165587623000162; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2023.111450; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85147820392&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36773448; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0165587623000162; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2023.111450
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know