Mesocolic hernia after laparoscopic transverse colectomy: A case report
International Journal of Surgery Case Reports, ISSN: 2210-2612, Vol: 66, Page: 136-138
2020
- 3Citations
- 8Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations3
- Citation Indexes3
- CrossRef2
- Captures8
- Readers8
Case Description
Internal hernias are rare after laparoscopic colorectal resections. We report a patient with an internal hernia through a defect in the transverse mesocolon following laparoscopic resection. A 52-year-old male underwent laparoscopic colectomy for transverse colon cancer and had an unremarkable postoperative course. Thirty days postoperatively, he presented to the emergency room with sudden onset abdominal pain and vomiting. Enhanced abdominal computed tomography scan showed strangulated small intestine in the left upper abdomen. An internal hernia through the mesenteric defect created during the recent colon resection was suspected, and emergency laparotomy was performed. One hundred thirty cm of small intestine was found herniated through a mesenteric defect. After repositioning the ischemic-appearing intestine, a 5 cm defect in the transverse mesocolon was found which had not been closed during the previous laparoscopic operation. No intestinal resection was needed, and the mesenteric defect closed with non-absorbable sutures. The post-operative course was unremarkable except for paralytic ileus, which resolved without further intervention. The incidence of internal hernia through a mesenteric defect after laparoscopic colorectal resection is quite low. Therefore, routine closure of the mesenteric defect after laparoscopic colorectal resection is not required. However, a left sided defect in the transverse mesocolon might be at higher risk of causing an internal hernia on anatomic grounds. We believe that mesenteric defects should be closed after laparoscopic resection of the left side of transverse colon, regardless of their size.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210261219306960; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2019.11.061; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85076177405&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31838433; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2210261219306960; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2019.11.061
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know