Gracilis muscle flap combined with a laparoscopic transabdominal approach is effective in the treatment of post-prostatectomy rectourethral fistula: A case report
International Journal of Surgery Case Reports, ISSN: 2210-2612, Vol: 92, Page: 106856
2022
- 3Citations
- 8Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations3
- Citation Indexes3
- Captures8
- Readers8
Case Description
Rectourethral fistula (RUF) after prostatectomy is a rare complication; however, when it occurs it is likely to be intractable and treatment requires surgical closure of the fistula. Several approaches to fistula closure have been reported, but there is no established treatment. The patient was a 66-year-old man who had undergone robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. On the 16th postoperative day, RUF was diagnosed. Cystostomy, laparoscopic ileostomy and transanal fistula closure were performed, and conservative treatment was continued for 5 months; however, the RUF remained, so the patient underwent fistula closure with a gracilis muscle flap using both transperineal and laparoscopic manipulation. Because it was a high fistula, the RUF was difficult to fill with a transperineal approach alone; however, in combination with laparoscopic manipulation, the appropriate filling of the fistula was possible. Although few reports have described the use of the laparoscopic transabdominal approach in combination with a transperineal gracilis muscle flap, the advantages of this technique are that the superior part of the fistula can be dissected, the flap can be filled more securely than with a transperineal approach alone, and transabdominal manipulation can be performed in a less invasive manner. In addition, by coordinating perineal and laparoscopic manipulation, we were able to close the fistula without organ damage by safe dissection. The laparoscopic approach is useful for RUF closure because it allows the interposition of the flap to reliably fill the space between the bladder and the rectum.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221026122200102X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2022.106856; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85125750559&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35276434; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S221026122200102X; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2022.106856
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know