Building capabilities to manage strategic alliances
Industrial Marketing Management, ISSN: 0019-8501, Vol: 40, Issue: 6, Page: 875-886
2011
- 78Citations
- 274Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Recently, academics have attributed a large part of alliance success to a firm's ability to successfully manage its alliances, also called its level of alliance management capability. We contribute to this growing body of literature by (1) verifying the impact of alliance management capability on alliance performance and (2) analyzing the drivers of alliance management capability. We measure this capability through four types of alliance learning processes and study how each of these processes affects alliance outcome. Furthermore, we take into account several possible drivers of alliance management capability such as organizational culture, commitment of the top team, alliance experience and the alliance function. We refine the results by examining how these factors affect each of the four learning processes underpinning alliance management capability. Our research model will be tested on a sample of 189 Belgian companies using PLS. We find that the commitment of the top management team is the most critical factor in explaining success with alliances.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019850111000812; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.06.022; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=80052269431&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0019850111000812; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0019850111000812?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0019850111000812?httpAccept=text/plain; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.06.022
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know