A systematic literature review of low-cost 3D mapping solutions
Information Fusion, ISSN: 1566-2535, Vol: 114, Page: 102656
2025
- 3Citations
- 40Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In "low-cost" solutions, ensuring economic accessibility and democratizing the availability of emerging technologies stand as pivotal considerations. This study undertakes a systematic literature review of low-cost 3D mapping solutions. Leveraging SCOPUS as the primary database, a comprehensive bibliometric analysis encompassing 1380 publications was conducted, subsequently narrowing the focus to 87 recent publications for detailed review. This research endeavors to delineate the defining characteristics of low-cost systems, elucidate their principal applications and preferred platforms, assess accessibility level, gauge the extent of innovation in both hardware and software development, explore the contributions of Deep Learning and data fusion, evaluate the consideration of data quality, and examine the contemporary relevance of photogrammetry within low-cost context. The findings demonstrate that many authors subjectively use the term low-cost to highlight qualities of a technology, methodology or sensor, but challenges arise from data quality comparisons with high-cost systems.
Bibliographic Details
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know