Atmospheric absorption ratio algorithm for airborne short-wave infrared hyperspectral imagery spectral calibration based on carbon dioxide and water vapor
Infrared Physics & Technology, ISSN: 1350-4495, Vol: 111, Page: 103514
2020
- 7Citations
- 4Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In view of the fact that the hyperspectral imager can simultaneously obtain the target’s geometric and spectral characteristics, it has been widely applied in many research fields. However, due to the changes in the laboratory and the on-board environment, center wavelengths of the on-board spectral response function (SRF) need to be recalibrated to ensure high-precision measurement of the target’s spectral characteristics retrieved by hyperspectral imager. In this paper, an on-board spectral calibration method for short-wave hyperspectral imager based on constructing differential function between the simulated and the actual absorption ratios is introduced in detail, and the center wavelength offsets of the on-board SRF during the operation process can be monitored through the statistics of the best spectral smoothing position of each frame of the flight image. Moreover, the on-board offsets of SRF in different spectral channels is studied in this paper. Experiments show that the deviation of SRF of on-board hyperspectral imager is not linear, and the three-sigma confidence interval is ±0.38 nm. The method is beneficial to improve the practical application ability of short-wave hyperspectral imagers.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350449520305624; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.infrared.2020.103514; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85092487015&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1350449520305624; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.infrared.2020.103514
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know