Mechanical torque measurement for in vivo quantification of bone strength in the proximal femur
Injury, ISSN: 0020-1383, Vol: 43, Issue: 10, Page: 1712-1717
2012
- 9Citations
- 55Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations9
- Citation Indexes8
- CrossRef8
- Policy Citations1
- Policy Citation1
- Captures55
- Readers55
- 55
Article Description
Bone strength determines fracture risk and fixation strength of osteosynthesis implants. In vivo, bone strength is currently measured indirectly by quantifying bone mineral density (BMD) which is however only one determinant of the bone's biomechanical competence besides the bone's macro- and micro-architecture and tissue related parameters. We have developed a measurement principle (DensiProbe™ Hip) for direct, mechanical quantification of bone strength within the proximal femur upon hip fracture fixation. Previous cadaver tests indicated a close correlation between DensiProbe™ Hip measurements, 3D micro-CT analysis and biomechanical indicators of bone strength. The goal of this study was to correlate DensiProbe™ Hip measurements with areal bone mineral density (BMD). Forty-three hip fracture patients were included in this study. Intraoperatively, DensiProbe™ Hip was inserted to the subsequent hip screw tip position within the femoral head. Peak torque to breakaway of local cancellous bone was registered. Thirty-seven patients underwent areal BMD measurements of the contralateral proximal femur. Failure of fixation was assessed radio graphically 6 and 12 weeks postoperatively. Peak torque and femoral neck BMD showed significant correlations ( R = 0.60, P = 0.0001). In regression analysis, areal BMD explained 46% of femoral neck BMD variance in a quadratic relationship. Throughout the 12-week follow-up period, no failure of fixation was observed. DensiProbe™ Hip may capture variations of bone strength beyond areal BMD which are currently difficult to measure in vivo. A multicenter study will clarify if peak torque predicts fixation failure.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138312002367; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.014; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84865490140&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22795727; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0020138312002367; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.014
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know