Trochanteric entry femoral nails yield better femoral version and lower revision rates—A large cohort multivariate regression analysis
Injury, ISSN: 0020-1383, Vol: 48, Issue: 6, Page: 1165-1169
2017
- 6Citations
- 43Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations6
- Citation Indexes6
- CrossRef4
- Captures43
- Readers43
- 43
Article Description
Intramedullary nailing (IMN) has become the standard of care for the treatment of most femoral shaft fractures. Different IMN options include trochanteric and piriformis entry as well as retrograde nails, which may result in varying degrees of femoral rotation. The objective of this study was to analyze postoperative femoral version between three types of nails and to delineate any significant differences in femoral version (DFV) and revision rates.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002013831730150X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2017.03.017; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85016646347&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28365071; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S002013831730150X; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2017.03.017
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know