Avoiding flatness in factoring ordinal data
Information Sciences, ISSN: 0020-0255, Vol: 629, Page: 471-487
2023
- 2Citations
- 1Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Factorization of classical, two-valued Boolean data became a widely studied topic in the past decade due to its role in analyzing relational data as well as its significance for other fields. Recently, various extensions to factorization of ordinal data, or data with graded (fuzzy) attributes, have been proposed. We identify and describe a fundamental problem regarding quality of factors, which is non-existent in the Boolean case, but naturally appears in the more general setting of ordinal data. As we demonstrate, the problem gets more significant with growing size of the factorized data. We analyze the problem, propose a method to alleviate it, and evaluate experimentally our solution to the problem. We also provide a discussion regarding ramifications of our findings for the concept of cardinality of fuzzy sets.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020025523001755; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2023.02.002; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85148014639&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0020025523001755; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2023.02.002
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know