Deriving priorities from the fuzzy best-worst method matrix and its applications: A perspective of incomplete reciprocal preference relation
Information Sciences, ISSN: 0020-0255, Vol: 634, Page: 761-778
2023
- 8Citations
- 6Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Preference relation is an effective tool in multi-criteria decision making (MCDM). The fuzzy best-worst method (FBWM), which is an extension of the BWM, is proposed to determine weights for criteria. In the FBWM, the Fuzzy Best-to-others Vector ( FBV ) and Fuzzy others-to-Worst Vector ( FWV ) are given. The FBV and FWV can intrinsically formulate one incomplete reciprocal preference relation (IRPR), which we call the FBWM matrix. As the FBWM is designed mainly to determine the weights, and the existing FBWM only uses the min–max problem to derive the weights. Therefore, it is important to develop other effective methods to derive the weights from the FBWM matrix. Deriving the weights from FBWM matrix is converted into deriving the priorities from the corresponding IRPR. In this view, two groups of methods are proposed. One group is for a single FBWM matrix, and the other group is for a group of FBWM matrices. To show the effectiveness and performance of the developed methods, Monte Carlo simulations were implemented. Finally, two examples were used to show how these methods are applied in real decision-making problems. Comparative analyses were performed to show the differences and usefulness of the proposed methods.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020025523004498; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2023.03.125; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85151344156&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0020025523004498; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2023.03.125
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know