Unleashing Fintech’s potential: A catalyst for green bonds issuance
Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, ISSN: 1042-4431, Vol: 93, Page: 102009
2024
- 2Citations
- 2Usage
- 103Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations2
- Citation Indexes2
- Usage2
- Abstract Views2
- Captures103
- Readers103
- 103
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- News1
Article Description
Financial technology, also known as fintech, is transforming daily lives and revolutionising the financial industry. However, there is currently no consensus regarding the effect of fintech on the green bond market. Using novel Chinese data, this study provides robust evidence that fintech development can significantly boost green bond issuance. Further analysis suggests that this promotional effect occurs by empowering intermediary institutions and increasing social environmental awareness. Additionally, we investigate the heterogeneous effect and find that the positive relationship is more pronounced for bonds without high ratings and whose proceeds are not used for refinancing. This effect is also stronger for non-state-owned issuers and in cities connected with High-Speed Railway networks or located in the eastern region of China. These results call for attention from policymakers and security managers to take further notice of fintech utilisation in green finance products.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1042443124000751; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2024.102009; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85193621460&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1042443124000751; https://ro.uow.edu.au/test2021/11673; https://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=17220&context=test2021; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2024.102009
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know