Optimal nonlinear pricing by a monopoly with smooth ambiguity preferences
International Review of Economics & Finance, ISSN: 1059-0560, Vol: 89, Page: 594-604
2024
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures1
- Readers1
Article Description
This paper examines the optimal nonlinear pricing by a monopolist who has smooth ambiguity preferences and sells a single good to two types of buyers with high and low valuation. Ambiguity arises from the monopolist’s uncertainty about which of the subjective beliefs govern the unobserved types of buyers. We show that the prevalence of ambiguity aversion distorts the rent extraction-efficiency tradeoff under asymmetric information in the standard model. Specifically, the ambiguity-averse monopolist acts in a pessimistic manner with the perception that buyers are less likely to have high valuation than the objective beliefs. Compared with the standard model, low valuation buyers consume a less downward distorted quantity and high valuation buyers enjoy a greater information rent. The unit prices paid by all buyers are reduced and the ambiguity-averse monopolist earns a smaller expected profit.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056023002861; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2023.07.091; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85167397831&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1059056023002861; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2023.07.091
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know