Epidemics, local institutional quality, and corporate cash holdings
International Review of Economics & Finance, ISSN: 1059-0560, Vol: 92, Page: 193-210
2024
- 1Citations
- 20Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
- CrossRef1
- Captures20
- Readers20
- 20
Article Description
The increase in corporate cash holdings, particularly in the U.S., has garnered significant attention from academia, the popular press, and policymakers. While most existing studies explain this trend using endogenous microeconomic measures, there is limited empirical evidence of what may have caused corporate cash holdings to decrease. From a macroeconomic perspective, this study provides the first examination of the effects of exogenous health epidemics and local institutional quality on corporate cash holdings, using a large and unique international dataset of 380,966 companies from 39 economies. The analysis reveals a decrease in corporate cash holdings during epidemics, particularly in countries with higher local institutional quality, as indicated by their financial regulatory and governance capacity. This study conducts a robustness test, and the findings underscore the importance of local institutional quality, particularly during epidemics.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056024000911; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2024.02.019; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85185527392&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1059056024000911; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2024.02.019
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know