Quality monitoring method based on enhanced canonical component analysis
ISA Transactions, ISSN: 0019-0578, Vol: 105, Page: 221-229
2020
- 6Citations
- 6Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In continuous processes, the quality variables generally can be interpreted by the process variables due to intercorrelation. However, in particular condition, the past quality trends may be responsible for interpretation due to the auto-correlation. The existing methods only reveal one of the correlations. Considering the effects of two types of correlations for quality monitoring, this study develops enhanced canonical component analysis (ECCoA) method based on Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA). For revealing the intercorrelation, CCA is performed to extract the quality related features from the process variables. However, the components of CCA ignore the variance formation in the data. To retain both cross-data (process variables and quality variables) correlation information and the variance information within process variables, principle projective-CCA (PP-CCA) method is proposed, generating the primary feature subspace to capture the variation of quality variables. Moreover, as for the auto-correlation, on the residual obtained in PP-CCA method, a residual-CCA (R-CCA) method is proposed for modelling and generating the complementary feature subspace, reflecting the trends of quality variables. Sequentially, statistical indexes and decision-making logic are established for online monitoring. A numerical case and the Tennessee Eastman process are tested for validation. The achieved results indicate the feasibility and efficiency of the proposed enhanced canonical component analysis method.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019057820302548; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2020.06.008; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85087353359&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32624172; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0019057820302548; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2020.06.008
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know