Sensor drift fault diagnosis for chiller system using deep recurrent canonical correlation analysis and k-nearest neighbor classifier
ISA Transactions, ISSN: 0019-0578, Vol: 122, Page: 232-246
2022
- 69Citations
- 57Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations69
- Citation Indexes69
- 69
- CrossRef32
- Captures57
- Readers57
- 57
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- News1
Most Recent News
Studies from Tianjin University Further Understanding of Technology (Sensor Drift Fault Diagnosis for Chiller System Using Deep Recurrent Canonical Correlation Analysis and K-nearest Neighbor Classifier)
2023 JAN 16 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Tech Daily News -- Current study results on Technology have been published. According
Article Description
Early detection and diagnosis of the chiller sensor drift fault are crucial to maintain normal operation for energy saving. Due to the complex physical structure and operation conditions, sensor drift fault in the chiller system is difficult to discover. To improve the energy efficiency and operation reliability of the chiller system, this paper proposes a novel chiller sensor drift fault diagnosis method using deep recurrent canonical correlation analysis and k-nearest neighbor (KNN) classifier. A deep bidirectional long short-term memory recurrent neural network-based deep recurrent canonical correlation analysis (BLCCA) model is developed, which can automatically extract the nonlinear and temporal features from raw operation data in the chiller system. Based on the proposed BLCCA model, a residual generator is designed to generate the directional residual vector. The cumulative residual vector method is employed to improve the detectability of the sensor drift fault. An efficient KNN-based method is applied to classify the residual vector and judge the faulty sensor. Different distance measures and neighbor numbers are further analyzed to optimize the fault diagnosis performance. The proposed fault detection and diagnosis (FDD) method is validated by using a data set which has been collected from an actual chiller system. Three different state-of-the-art fault diagnosis methods are used for comparison with the proposed method. The comparisons of the experimental results demonstrate that this method achieves significant fault diagnosis performance in terms of diagnosis accuracy, recall, and F measure (F1 score).
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019057821002342; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2021.04.037; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85105597510&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33985786; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0019057821002342; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2021.04.037
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know