Influence of data sampling methods on the representation of neural spiking activity in vivo
iScience, ISSN: 2589-0042, Vol: 25, Issue: 11, Page: 105429
2022
- 3Citations
- 14Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations3
- Citation Indexes3
- CrossRef2
- Captures14
- Readers14
- 14
- Mentions1
- Blog Mentions1
- 1
Most Recent Blog
More Than a Small Brain: The Importance of Studying Neural Function during Development
PreviousNext Viewpoints More Than a Small Brain: The Importance of Studying Neural Function during Development James C. Dooley and Meike E. van der Heijden Journal
Article Description
In vivo single-unit recordings distinguish the basal spiking properties of neurons in different experimental settings and disease states. Here, we examined over 300 spike trains recorded from Purkinje cells and cerebellar nuclei neurons to test whether data sampling approaches influence the extraction of rich descriptors of firing properties. Our analyses included neurons recorded in awake and anesthetized control mice, and disease models of ataxia, dystonia, and tremor. We find that recording duration circumscribes overall representations of firing rate and pattern. Notably, shorter recording durations skew estimates for global firing rate variability toward lower values. We also find that only some populations of neurons in the same mouse are more similar to each other than to neurons recorded in different mice. These data reveal that recording duration and approach are primary considerations when interpreting task-independent single neuron firing properties. If not accounted for, group differences may be concealed or exaggerated.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004222017011; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.105429; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85141241857&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36388953; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2589004222017011; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.105429
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know