Comparison of high-density LiDAR and satellite photogrammetry for forest inventory
ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, ISSN: 0924-2716, Vol: 142, Page: 257-267
2018
- 62Citations
- 159Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Point cloud data derived from stereo satellite imagery has the potential to provide large-scale forest inventory assessment but these methods are known to include higher error than airborne laser scanning (ALS). This study compares the accuracy of forest inventory attributes estimated from high-density ALS (21.1 pulses m −2 ) point cloud data (PCD) and PCD derived from photogrammetric methods applied to stereo satellite imagery obtained over a Pinus radiata D. Don plantation forest in New Zealand. The statistical and textural properties of the canopy height models (CHMs) derived from each point cloud were included alongside standard PCD metrics as a means of improving the accuracy of predictions for key forest inventory attributes. For mean top height (a measure of dominant height in a stand), ALS data produced better estimates ( R 2 = 0.88; RMSE = 1.7 m) than those obtained from satellite data ( R 2 = 0.81; RMSE = 2.1 m). This was attributable to a general over-estimation of canopy heights in the satellite PCD. ALS models produced poor estimates of stand density ( R 2 = 0.48; RMSE = 112.1 stems ha −1 ), as did the satellite PCD models ( R 2 = 0.42; RMSE = 118.4 stems ha −1 ). ALS models produced accurate estimates of basal area ( R 2 = 0.58; RMSE = 12 m 2 ha −1 ), total stem volume ( R 2 = 0.72; RMSE = 107.5 m 3 ha −1 ), and total recoverable volume ( R 2 = 0.74; RMSE = 92.9 m 3 ha −1 ). These values differed little from the estimates of basal area ( R 2 = 0.57; RMSE = 12.2 m 2 ha −1 ), total stem volume ( R 2 = 0.70; RMSE = 112.6 m 3 ha −1 ), and total recoverable volume ( R 2 = 0.73; RMSE = 96 m 3 ha −1 ) obtained from satellite PCD models. The statistical and textural metrics computed from the CHMs were important variables in all of the models derived from both satellite and ALS PCD, nearly always outranking the standard PCD metrics in measures of importance. For the satellite PCD models, the CHM-derived metrics were nearly exclusively identified as important variables. These results clearly show that point cloud data obtained from stereo satellite imagery are useful for prediction of forest inventory attributes in intensively managed forests on steeper terrain. Furthermore, these data offer forest managers the benefit of obtaining both inventory data and high-resolution multispectral imagery from a single product.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924271618301709; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.06.006; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85048805808&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0924271618301709; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.06.006
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know