Seismic reliability analysis of high-pier railway bridges with correlated random parameters via an improved maximum entropy method
Structures, ISSN: 2352-0124, Vol: 33, Page: 4538-4555
2021
- 9Citations
- 12Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Seismic reliability analysis is crucially important for the seismic performance evaluation and probabilistic seismic risk assessment of bridges. However, the exact and efficient computation of seismic reliability for a practical bridge with uncertainty is still challenging. This study presents a composite method of maximum entropy principle with fractional moments, partially stratified sampling, and Nataf transformation for the seismic reliability analysis of bridge with correlated random parameters, and then evaluates the impact of random variable correlation on the probabilistic seismic performance of high-pier continues rigid frame bridge (CRFB). Different from the existing maximum entropy method, a unbiased likelihood function-based maximum entropy method is proposed to compute the extreme value distribution (EVD) of structural nonlinear seismic response. To illustrate the efficiency and accuracy of the proposed method, a hysteretic nonlinear single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) system and a simplified two-span bridge are first taken as examples. The obtained EVD is compared with the results of Monte Carlo simulation, current maximum entropy method, and widely used probability distribution model fitting. The proposed method is then applied to evaluate the seismic reliability of a practical high-pier CRFB. The influence of uncertainties and variable correlation of structural parameters on the seismic reliability of high-pier CRFB is discussed in detail. The analysis results indicate the high efficiency and accuracy of the proposed method and demonstrate the significant importance of structural parameter correlation on the probabilistic seismic performance assessment of high-pier CRFB.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235201242100655X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.07.039; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85111261761&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S235201242100655X; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S235201242100655X?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S235201242100655X?httpAccept=text/plain; https://dul.usage.elsevier.com/doi/; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.07.039
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know