Seismic fragility analysis of critical facilities in communication base station based on shaking table test
Structures, ISSN: 2352-0124, Vol: 50, Page: 1726-1741
2023
- 3Citations
- 2Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Most Recent News
Recent Findings in Structure Research Described by Researchers from China Earthquake Administration (Seismic Fragility Analysis of Critical Facilities In Communication Base Station Based On Shaking Table Test)
2023 APR 24 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Tech Daily News -- Research findings on Structure Research are discussed in a
Article Description
The seismic fragility analysis of communication equipment can be utilized for pre-earthquake disaster prediction and targeted improvement of their seismic performance; on the other hand, it can also serve as a basis for post-earthquake loss estimation. However, the failure modes of the critical facilities in the base station cannot be accurately predicted by performing finite element analysis. Therefore, this paper conducts the seismic fragility analysis for storage battery pack (SBP) and equipment cabinet (EC), commonly used in communication base stations, through the incremental dynamic analysis method based on the shaking table test. A total of two SBPs and three ECs with the same specification were included in this study. The seismic ground records were processed using amplitude modulation before being input into the shaking table for testing. Test phenomena were used to determine the damage level and damage index for SBP and EC. Based on the results of the incremental dynamic analysis of the shaking table test, the seismic fragility of the SBP and EC was assessed. It was found that the failure of SBP was due mainly to the collisions of storage batteries, while that of EC was caused primarily by excessive displacement response. The findings of this paper will contribute to the evaluation of the seismic performance of the overall communication system.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352012423002898; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2023.03.003; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85149671439&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2352012423002898; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2023.03.003
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know