A framework for low-carbon mix design of recycled aggregate concrete with supplementary cementitious materials using machine learning and optimization algorithms
Structures, ISSN: 2352-0124, Vol: 61, Page: 106143
2024
- 7Citations
- 50Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This study presents a framework for designing low-carbon and cost-effective mixtures of recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) with supplementary cementitious materials by integrating machine learning and grey wolf optimizer algorithms. The concrete mix design process considers key performance parameters such as compressive strength, chloride ion penetration resistance, and carbonation resistance. A dataset comprising 5306 data samples from 154 scientific resources is collected from the literature to train the machine learning models. Four different techniques, namely random forest, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), light gradient boosting (LightBoost), and category boosting (CatBoost) are employed to model the compressive strength, chloride ion penetration, and carbonation resistances of RAC. The best-performing models are then utilized to optimize the RAC mix design by minimizing the cost and reducing the carbon footprint. The results indicate that the CatBoost model demonstrates better predictive performance for the compressive strength and carbonation resistance, while the XGBoost and LightBoost models perform better in estimating chloride ion penetration resistance. Furthermore, the adoption of low-carbon mix design principles leads to a reduction in carbon footprint by 5.0% to 31.5% compared to cost-effective mix design for different compressive strength targets, with varying permeability levels. The framework provides a promising approach for designing environmentally friendly RAC mixtures while considering economic and durability factors.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352012424002959; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2024.106143; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85186761046&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2352012424002959; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2024.106143
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know