Evaluation of New Seismic provisions for special concentrically braced frames in AISC 341-22
Structures, ISSN: 2352-0124, Vol: 63, Page: 106453
2024
- 6Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures6
- Readers6
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- News1
Most Recent News
Researchers' Work from Iowa State University Focuses on Structure Research (Evaluation of New Seismic Provisions for Special Concentrically Braced Frames In Aisc 341-22)
2024 JUL 03 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Tech Daily News -- Fresh data on Structure Research are presented in a
Article Description
The seismic provisions for special concentrically braced frame (SCBF) had expected the properly detailed braces to provide inelastic cyclic deformation of 10 - 20 ductility without fracture during the design earthquake ground motions over 30 years prior to 2022. The new seismic provisions for SCBF in AISC 341–22 eliminates the clear and quantifiable statements on the expected capacity and demand of the braces, and indicates that the diagonal braces can sustain large inelastic cyclic deformations without experiencing premature failures if they are properly detailed for ductility as prescribed in the provisions. The appearance of such word as “large inelastic deformation” and “premature failure” causes a concern about the uncertainty. One might wonder why a range of amount of inelastic cyclic deformation capacity for a properly detailed brace cannot be defined after more than 40 years of extensive research on SCBF. This paper presents a study using available data accumulated over more than 40 years to investigate how much inelastic cyclic deformations are needed for braces to avoid fracture under the design earthquake, and concludes that the SCBFs with properly detailed square HSS have insufficient inelastic cyclic deformations to avoid experiencing premature failures that lead to structural collapse under the design earthquake.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352012424006052; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2024.106453; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85192202955&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2352012424006052; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2024.106453
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know