Predictors of visual outcomes in pediatric open globe injuries
Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, ISSN: 1091-8531, Vol: 24, Issue: 6, Page: 360.e1-360.e8
2020
- 9Citations
- 14Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations9
- Citation Indexes9
- CrossRef3
- Captures14
- Readers14
- 14
Article Description
To identify predictors of visual outcomes in children with open globe injuries. The medical records of patients (≤18 years of age) with open globe injury from 2012 to 2020 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. The Pediatric Ocular Trauma Scores (POTS) and Toddler Ocular Trauma Scores (TOTS) were assessed against our cohort. Univariate and multivariate linear regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of visual outcome. A total of 85 eyes of 85 pediatric patients (63 males [74%]) were included. Median patient age was 8.9 years. Final best-corrected visual acuity was significantly associated with presenting vision ( P = 0.0001), age at injury ( P = 0.02), lens involvement ( P < 0.0001), retinal detachment ( P < 0.0001), and location of injury ( P < 0.0001). In a multivariate linear regression model, only presenting visual acuity and retinal detachment were independent predictors of outcome. When visual acuity was unknown, age at injury, lens involvement, and retinal detachment were independently associated with final visual acuity. POTS and TOTS scores moderately correlated with final best-corrected visual acuity ( R 2 = 0.51 and R 2 = 0.53, resp.). We identified patient characteristics predicting visual outcomes in a large US-based cohort of pediatric open globe injuries. POTS and TOTS scores moderately correlated with final visual acuity; however, the small study sizes from which they were derived preclude our identifying which predictors are most important. Development of a more predictive model will require a large multicenter study population or registry.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1091853120302986; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2020.08.010; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85097734157&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33271286; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1091853120302986; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2020.08.010
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know