Subclinical markers of strabismus in children 5-18 years of age
Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, ISSN: 1091-8531, Vol: 25, Issue: 3, Page: 139.e1-139.e5
2021
- 3Citations
- 22Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations3
- Citation Indexes3
- Captures22
- Readers22
- 22
Article Description
To report the prevalence of subclinical markers of strabismus from a community-based screening of children. A family history and ophthalmic examination (including six markers of strabismus: oblique muscle dysfunction, stereopsis <60 arcsec, monofixation, nasal-temporal pursuit asymmetry, dissociated strabismus, and anisometropia) were obtained from consecutive children, aged 5-18 years, in the local school system and the pediatric outpatient clinic of Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. A total of 1,000 children (498 males [49.8%]) were examined at a mean age of 10.6 years (range, 5-18.98). Of the 1,000, 57 (5.7%) had strabismus, and 130 (13%) had some form of phoria. Of the 943 children without strabismus, 103 (10.9%) had one or more of the six subclinical markers, including 43 (4.5%) with inferior oblique dysfunction, 37 (3.9%) with anisometropia, 34 (3.6%) with subnormal stereopsis, 6 (0.6%) with nasal-temporal pursuit asymmetry, 3 (0.3%) with monofixation, and none with dissociated strabismus. A subclinical marker of strabismus occurred in 20 (12.7%) of the 157 nontropic subjects who had a family history of either strabismus, amblyopia, or both and in 83 (10.6%) of the 786 nontropic children without a family history. In this community-based screening of children, subclinical disorders of binocular vision occurred in 10%-13% of children without strabismus, of which inferior oblique muscle dysfunction, anisometropia, and subnormal stereopsis were most prevalent. Identifying these disorders among strabismic families may be useful in elucidating the genetic puzzle of childhood strabismus.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1091853121001361; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2021.02.008; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85109099828&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34082112; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1091853121001361; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2021.02.008
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know