Cardiac Shock Care Centers
Journal of the American College of Cardiology, ISSN: 0735-1097, Vol: 72, Issue: 16, Page: 1972-1980
2018
- 137Citations
- 171Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations137
- Citation Indexes137
- 137
- CrossRef89
- Captures171
- Readers171
- 157
- 14
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- News1
Most Recent News
Impella in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: History and Current Controversies
Abstract In this review, the authors discuss a brief history of the Impella mechanical circulatory support device, a mechanistic role for the device in the
Review Description
Despite advances over the past decade, the incidence of cardiogenic shock secondary to acute myocardial infarction has increased, with an unchanged mortality near 50%. Recent trials have not clarified the best strategies in treatment. While dedicated cardiac shock centers are being established, there are no standardized agreements on the utilization of mechanical circulatory support and the timeliness of percutaneous coronary intervention strategies. In some centers and prospective registries, outcomes after placement of advanced mechanical circulatory support prior to reperfusion therapy with percutaneous coronary intervention have been encouraging with improved survival. Here, we suggest systems of care with a treatment pathway for patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735109718369407; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.07.074; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85054034446&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30309475; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0735109718369407; https://academicworks.medicine.hofstra.edu/articles/3247; https://my.hofstra.edu/hofapps/applications/ezproxy/indexMed.jsp?db_proxy=m&&db_url=www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735109718369407; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.07.074
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know