PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Biologics for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps

Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, ISSN: 0091-6749, Vol: 145, Issue: 3, Page: 725-739
2020
  • 133
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 180
    Captures
  • 1
    Mentions
  • 315
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

  • Citations
    133
  • Captures
    180
  • Mentions
    1
    • News Mentions
      1
      • 1
  • Social Media
    315
    • Shares, Likes & Comments
      315
      • Facebook
        315

Most Recent News

Management of Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP) in the Pan-Arab Region: Consensus Recommendations from a Multidisciplinary Expert Working Group

Introduction Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a common and often debilitating condition, with a substantial impact upon patients’ quality of life (QoL).1 CRS can be characterized

Review Description

With the increasing recognition of the role of type 2 immune responses in chronic rhinosinusitis, its severity, recurrence, and comorbidities, several biologics targeting IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 as well as IgE have been administered in small proof-of-concept studies. Recently, the first phase 3 trials have been reported with dupilumab, an IL-4 receptor antagonist, demonstrating a significant and clinically relevant reduction of the disease burden from polyp size and sinus involvement to symptoms and smell; these changes consecutively led to an important increase in quality of life. Finally, the biologic versus placebo treatment reduced the need for systemic glucocorticosteroids and sinus surgery significantly and clinically meaningfully. Dupilumab today is registered for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in Europe and the United States. Within a year, 2 further phase 3 trials with omalizumab and mepolizumab will be reported. With this development, without any doubt, a new era for the treatment of severe uncontrolled chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps has begun. Questions on the indication of the biologics, the selection of patients, and finally criteria for monitoring the efficacy in individual patients need to be urgently answered, and care pathways need to be established integrating the current standard of care including surgery.

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know