The Diagnostic Workup in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria—What to Test and Why
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, ISSN: 2213-2198, Vol: 9, Issue: 6, Page: 2274-2283
2021
- 34Citations
- 58Captures
- 2Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations34
- Citation Indexes33
- 33
- CrossRef18
- Policy Citations1
- Policy Citation1
- Captures58
- Readers58
- 58
- Mentions2
- News Mentions1
- News1
- References1
- Wikipedia1
Most Recent News
Omalizumab in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: A Real-World Study on Effectiveness, Safety and Predictors of Treatment Outcome
Introduction Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a debilitating skin disorder characterized by the recurrent appearance of wheals, angioedema, or both for more than six weeks,
Article Description
In chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), the guidelines recommend very limited diagnostic procedures during the routine workup, although additional investigations might be indicated in some patients with CSU. For physicians treating patients with CSU, it is often difficult to decide which diagnostic tests are useful. To provide recommendations on what diagnostic tests should be performed on which patients with CSU. We performed an extensive literature search on the respective topics and identified relevant questions that should prompt diagnostic procedures based on the published evidence and expert consensus among all authors. We provide questions, diagnostic testing, where appropriate, and recommendation that should be included when assessing the history of a patient with CSU, to explore and rule out differential diagnoses, to assess patients for underlying causes and modifying conditions, to explore patients for comorbid diseases and consequences of having CSU, and to assess patients for CSU components that can help to predict their disease course and response to treatment. Here, we provide physicians treating patients with CSU with information about which clues should lead to which tests and why.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213219821004359; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2021.03.049; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85106298140&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33857657; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2213219821004359; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2021.03.049
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know