The Role of Patient Satisfaction Scores in Clinical Care and Physician Wellness
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, ISSN: 2213-2198, Vol: 12, Issue: 10, Page: 2610-2616
2024
- 12Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures12
- Readers12
- 12
Article Description
Patient satisfaction scores have become an integral part of the vocabulary of medical practitioners. Patient satisfaction scores are a domain far ignored, but which have recently gained prominence as patients have demanded a fair share of their own assessments of their medical caregivers. This has created a complex interplay of meeting patients’ demands and satisfying their wants and needs, which at times may not completely align with the best possible approach to management and standard of care algorithms. Here we present a commentary on patient satisfaction scores and their impact on physician well-being. We present historical aspects from both patient and provider perspectives and how they vary in private versus academic practice, and create some guidance for future refinement and implementation of these scores to serve two purposes: first, to allow for optimal doctor–patient relationships; and second, to enhance overall satisfaction for the patient as well as the physician.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213219824007414; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2024.06.051; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85201498352&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39032829; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2213219824007414
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know