Evaluation of an opioid pain teleconsultation service to address the opioid overdose epidemic in Colorado: A Health First Colorado demonstration project
Journal of the American Pharmacists Association, ISSN: 1544-3191, Vol: 63, Issue: 1, Page: 301-308
2023
- 1Citations
- 20Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
- CrossRef1
- Captures20
- Readers20
- 20
Article Description
Since the mid-1990s, more than 500,000 deaths have been attributed to the opioid overdose epidemic, which has created a serious national crisis affecting public health and social and economic welfare. To mitigate these opioid-related overdoses and deaths, interventions targeted at both the patient and community level are needed. This demonstration project sought to determine whether implementation of a provider-to-provider opioid pain teleconsultation service with a pain specialist was correlated with a reduction in inappropriate opioid use and improve health outcomes. Individual-level claims data for Health First Colorado Medicaid members were collected between March 1, 2017, and September 30, 2021, for individuals who triggered a provider-to-provider pain management teleconsultation based on receipt of a prescription for an opioid where the member was receiving a high-dose opioid (n = 125) or was opioid-naive (n = 819). The primary outcome measures were a patient’s opioid dose less than 200 morphine milligram equivalent (MME) by 6 months after the consult if consult was triggered for high-dose use or discontinuation of an opioid by 12 weeks after consult if the consult was triggered for opioid naivety. Secondary opioid-related health outcomes were also assessed. In the high-dose opioid cohort, 87% of the members had their monthly average MME reduced to less than 200 by 180 days after their consult. More than half of the opioid-naive group had discontinued their opioid by 90 days after their consult. Results indicate that provider-to-provider teleconsultation services with a pain specialist can be an effective intervention at reducing total inappropriate opioid use.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544319122003892; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.japh.2022.11.009; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85144779964&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36528493; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1544319122003892; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.japh.2022.11.009
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know