The hand and footprints at Qiusang in Tibet: Recommendations for dating rock art by U–Th
Journal of Archaeological Science, ISSN: 0305-4403, Vol: 161, Page: 105899
2024
- 2Captures
- 3Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures2
- Readers2
- Mentions3
- News Mentions3
- News3
Most Recent News
13 of the world's oldest artworks, some crafted by extinct human relatives
What constitutes art is heavily debated, and that's especially true for prehistoric art. But here are some of the contenders for the title of the
Review Description
The claims that children's hand and footprints on formerly soft travertine at Qiusang, Tibet, are about 200 ka old and are the earliest rock art on the planet are reviewed. The uranium-thorium results are inconsistent with a previous age estimate of another set of such prints nearby, which is itself at odds with finger-drawn Tibetan letters at that site. The claims also ignore the high susceptibility of open-site calcite travertine to surface retreat by weathering and the likely removal of uranium by rainwater. Similarly, deposition of detrital thorium can occur in such porous and weathered carbonates. Both processes are known to increase age estimates of reprecipitated carbonate deposits significantly. There is no evidence that hominins of the Middle Pleistocene occupied the central Tibetan Plateau during the penultimate glacial period. Several issues are considered, and recommendations are made for resolving the controversy.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440323001796; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2023.105899; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85181739457&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0305440323001796; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2023.105899
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know