Mineral deposition systems at rock art sites, Kimberley, Northern Australia — Field observations
Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, ISSN: 2352-409X, Vol: 14, Page: 340-352
2017
- 36Citations
- 44Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Mineral coatings, fringes, glazes and skins forming on the surfaces of sandstone rock shelters in Western Australia's Kimberley region offer the potential to provide datable materials to bracket ages of rock art motifs with which they are often spatially associated. These mineral deposition systems, which occur at the interface between the atmosphere and host rock, have never been characterised specifically and their overall formation mechanisms have yet to be completely established. This study serves to increase the understanding of complex processes behind the formation and long-term preservation potential of these mineral deposition systems. This is achieved by combining field observations with multiple mineralogical and geochemical characterisation techniques. Using both wet and dry season field observations and 94 mineral accretion samples collected from three different areas of the Kimberley, we identify four separate mineral deposition systems; polychrome fringes, dispersed wall coatings, floor glazes and silica skins. Detailed observations of the different characteristics of each deposition system are used to assess their suitability for the application of radiometric dating methods. Coherent internal stratigraphies are identified in polychrome fringe accretions, essential for the reliable application of uranium-series dating techniques, whilst floor glaze mineralogy, identified as dominated by carbon-bearing calcium oxalate minerals, provides radiocarbon dating opportunities. Consequently, this study provides a rigorous basis for establishing targeted sampling and analysis strategies essential for reliable and replicable rock art dating as well as having implications for rock art conservation.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X17300822; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2017.06.009; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85020927354&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2352409X17300822; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2017.06.009
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know