Multi-scale contact mechanics framework for upper palaeolithic ground stone tools
Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, ISSN: 2352-409X, Vol: 61, Page: 104939
2025
- 2Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures2
- Readers2
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- News1
Most Recent News
New Archaeology Findings from IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca Outlined (Multi-scale Contact Mechanics Framework for Upper Palaeolithic Ground Stone Tools)
2025 JAN 31 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at NewsRx Science Daily -- Current study results on Science - Archaeology have been
Article Description
This work presents a multi-scale and multi-resolution digital twin model of Upper Paleolithic ground stone tools (GSTs) to simulate their tribological evolutions. The physics-based digital twin relies on a multi-scale dataset of a passive tool used in a replicative experiment, incorporating the stone macroscale 3D reconstruction and the profilometric microscale surface map. The computational model, simulating a vertical pounding action, allows the prediction of the pressure distributions and the real contact area, where surface modifications due to contact are prone to appear. It is based on the Boundary Elements Method for solving the contact problem at different scales, using the photogrammetric reconstruction of the stone surface at the macroscale and the 3D confocal scanning at the microscale. This unprecedented digital twin model links macroscale to microscale contact mechanics simulations and is validated against experimental replicas, comparing the prediction with the wear patterns observed on the passive tool’s surface.
Bibliographic Details
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know