Systematic evaluation of multiple NGS platforms for structural variants detection
Journal of Biological Chemistry, ISSN: 0021-9258, Vol: 299, Issue: 12, Page: 105436
2023
- 3Citations
- 6Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations3
- Citation Indexes3
- CrossRef1
- Captures6
- Readers6
Article Description
Structural variations (SV) are critical genome changes affecting human diseases. Although many hybridization-based methods exist, evaluating SVs through next-generation sequencing (NGS) data is still necessary for broader research exploration. Here, we comprehensively compared the performance of 16 SV callers and multiple NGS platforms using NA12878 whole genome sequencing (WGS) datasets. The results indicated that several SV callers performed well relatively, such as Manta, GRIDSS, LUMPY, TARDIS, FermiKit, and Wham. Meanwhile, all NGS platforms have a similar performance using a single software. Additionally, we found that the source of undetected SVs was mostly from long reads datasets, therefore, the more appropriate strategy for accurate SV detection will be an integration of long and shorter reads in the future. At present, in the period of NGS as a mainstream method in bioinformatics, our study would provide helpful and comprehensive guidelines for specific categories of SV research.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002192582302464X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2023.105436; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85179620141&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37944616; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S002192582302464X; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2023.105436
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know