Simultaneous in-air and underwater 3D kinematic analysis of swimmers: Feasibility and reliability of action sport cameras
Journal of Biomechanics, ISSN: 0021-9290, Vol: 168, Page: 112078
2024
- 4Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures4
- Readers4
Article Description
This study explored the potential of reconstructing the 3D motion of a swimmer’s hands with accuracy and consistency using action sport cameras (ASC) distributed in-air and underwater. To record at least two stroke cycles of an athlete performing a front crawl task, the cameras were properly calibrated to cover an acquisition volume of 3 m in X, 8 m in Y, and 3.5 m in Z axis, approximately. Camera calibration was attained by applying bundle adjustment in both environments. A testing wand, carrying two markers, was acquired to evaluate the three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction accuracy in-air, underwater, and over the water transition. The global 3D accuracy (mean absolute error) was less than 1.5 mm. The standard error of measurement and the coefficient of variation were smaller than 1 mm and 1%, respectively, revealing that the camera calibration procedure was highly repeatable. No significant correlation between the error magnitude (percentage error during the test and the retest sessions: 1.2 to 0.8%) and the transition from in-air to underwater was observed. The feasibility of the hand motion reconstruction was demonstrated by recording five swimmers during the front crawl stroke, in three different tasks performed at increasing efforts. Intra-class correlation confirmed the optimal agreement ( ICC> 0.90) among repeated stroke cycles of the same swimmer, irrespective of task effort. Skewness, close to 0, and kurtosis, close to 3.5, supported the hypothesis of negligible effects of the calibration and tracking errors on the motion and speed patterns. In conclusion, we may argue that ASCs, equipped with a robust bundle adjustment camera calibration technique, ensure reliable reconstruction of swimming motion in in-air and underwater large volumes.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929024001556; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112078; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85191028502&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38663110; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0021929024001556; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112078
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know