Development of Monascus purpureus monacolin K-hyperproducing mutant strains by synchrotron light irradiation and their comparative genome analysis
Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, ISSN: 1389-1723, Vol: 133, Issue: 4, Page: 362-368
2022
- 3Citations
- 18Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations3
- Citation Indexes3
- Captures18
- Readers18
- 18
Article Description
Monascus purpureus have been used for making koji and other fermented foods and supplements. M. purpureus characteristically produces monacolin K (MK), a secondary metabolite that competitively inhibits cholesterol synthesis. Synchrotron light irradiation was applied to induce mutation in the strain KUPM5 to improve the MK-producing ability of M. purpureus strain KUPM5. Screening by a bioassay utilizing sensitivities to yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae from 936 colonies allows isolating three mutant strains: SC01, SC02, and SC03. These mutant strains and the parental strain KUPM5 were subjected to make koji using rice, and their metabolites were compared. All strains SC01, SC02, and SC03 in koji showed higher production of MK than the strain KUPM5. Particularly, the SC02 strain produced MK threefold higher than KUPM5 and maintained the production capabilities of other metabolites, including red, yellow, and orange pigments, mycelial contents, and α-amylase activity comparable to those of the strain KUPM5. Comparative genome analysis among strain KUPM5 and the mutants revealed that synchrotron light irradiation introduced mutations in approximately 90% of the total genes, including SNV, MNV, and indel mutations. The frequencies of SNV substitution in the whole genome occupied 68.96% of all mutations, of which 92.38% were transversions and 7.62% were transitions. This study, therefore, proved the synchrotron light irradiation was highly efficient for the strain improvement of a filamentous fungus, M. purpureus, and provided insights into the properties of mutation in the fungus by this mutagen.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389172321003261; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2021.11.011; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85123733071&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35105506; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1389172321003261; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2021.11.011
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know