Functional evaluation of non-oxidative glycolysis in Escherichia coli in the stationary phase under microaerobic conditions
Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, ISSN: 1389-1723, Vol: 135, Issue: 4, Page: 291-297
2023
- 4Citations
- 3Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations4
- Citation Indexes4
- Captures3
- Readers3
Article Description
In microbial bioproduction, CO 2 emissions via pyruvate dehydrogenase in the Embden-Meyerhof pathway, which converts glucose to acetyl-CoA, is one of the challenges for enhancing carbon yield. The synthetic non-oxidative glycolysis (NOG) pathway transforms glucose into three acetyl-CoA molecules without CO 2 emission, making it an attractive module for metabolic engineering. Because the NOG pathway generates no ATP and NADH, it is expected to use a resting cell reaction. Therefore, it is important to characterize the feasibility of the NOG pathway during stationary phase. Here, we experimentally evaluated the in vivo metabolic flow of the NOG pathway in Escherichia coli. An engineered strain was constructed by introducing phosphoketolase from Bifidobacterium adolescentis into E. coli and by deleting competitive reactions. When the strain was cultured in magnesium-starved medium under microaerobic conditions, the carbon yield of acetate, an end-product of the NOG pathway, was six times higher than that of the control strain harboring an empty vector. Based on the mass balance constraints, the NOG flux was estimated to be between 2.89 and 4.64 mmol g −1 h −1, suggesting that the engineered cells can convert glucose through the NOG pathway with enough activity for bioconversion. Furthermore, to expand the application potential of NOG pathway-implemented strains, the theoretical maximum yields of various useful compounds were calculated using flux balance analysis. This suggests that the theoretical maximum yields of not only acetate but also lactam compounds can be increased by introducing the NOG pathway. This information will help in future applications of the NOG pathway.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389172323000026; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2023.01.002; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85147116342&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36720653; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1389172323000026; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2023.01.002
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know