Comparing repeated end range movements and Kinesio taping effects on head and neck movement pattern and discomfort in smartphone users
Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, ISSN: 1360-8592, Vol: 40, Page: 1949-1956
2024
- 5Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures5
- Readers5
Article Description
Using smartphones has increased exponentially, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic. However, there is a relationship between neck flexion angle during working with a smartphone and neck musculoskeletal disorders. Therefore, this study compares the effect of Kinesio taping and Repeated End Range Movements (RERM) on head and neck flexion angles changes during texting and discomfort after texting with a smartphone. Twenty-four smartphone users participated in this cross-over study. All of 24 subjects were experimented with the control, RERM and taping conditions. They filled Numeric Rating Scale questionnaire before and after 30 min of texting. In addition, their head and neck flexion angles were measured during the task by photogrammetry. In the RERM group, individuals felt significantly less discomfort than the control group after the task (P = 0.032). Although the slope of average head and neck flexion angles linear regression lines of all the three groups was positive before the break time, it became negative in the taping and control groups after the break time. In addition, the linear regression of average head and neck flexion angles of the RERM group was significantly different (P < 0.001). RERM can effectively maintain normal head and neck movement pattern during and reduce neck discomfort after texting on smartphone.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859224004686; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.10.044; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85207298700&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39593549; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1360859224004686
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know