Denosumab versus zoledronic acid in cases of surgically unsalvageable giant cell tumor of bone: A randomized clinical trial
Journal of Bone Oncology, ISSN: 2212-1374, Vol: 35, Page: 100441
2022
- 15Citations
- 34Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations15
- Citation Indexes15
- 15
- Captures34
- Readers34
- 34
Article Description
Giant-cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a relatively benign, but locally aggressive osteoclastogenic stromal tumour of the bone. Although denosumab has been approved as an monoclonal antibody against RANK ligand for the treatment of GCTB, few clinical trials of the benefit in tumor response have been conducted to prove the efficiency in Chinese population. In this multicentric, random controlled, clinical trial, 160 patients were enrolled to compare the therapeutic efficacy and safety of denosumab and zoledronic acid treatment in patients with surgically unsalvageable GCTB. Between 2nd Jan 2015 and 1st Jan 2018, 160 adults (aged ≥ 18 years) with ①surgically unsalvageable GCTB, ②surgically salvageable GCTB with planned surgery expected to result in severe morbidity were included in this randomized clinical trial. Patients received either subcutaneous denosumab (DB group; 120 mg once every 4 weeks with loading doses of 120 mg subcutaneously admininstered on days 8 and 15; n = 80) or intravenous zoledronic acid (ZA group; 4 mg once every 4 weeks; n = 80) for six cycles. Disease status, clinical benefits, treatment-emergent adverse effects, overall survival, and cost of treatment were evaluated during the follow-up period. Statistical significance was determined using 95% confidence intervals. Denosumab and zoledronic acid had similar tumor responses ( p = 0.118) and clinical benefits ( p = 0.574). Disease progression was observed in fewer patients in the DB group (12.5%) than ZA group (15.0%). Denosumab caused fatigue ( p = 0.001) and back pain ( p < 0.0001), while zoledronic acid caused hypocalcemia ( p < 0.0001), flu-like symptoms ( p = 0.059) and hypotension ( p = 0.059). Denosumab treatment was markedly more expensive than zoledronic acid treatment ( p < 0.0001). The cost to manage treatment-emergent adverse effects was the same for the ZA group and the DB group ( p = 0.425). The accumulate recurrence-free survival rate at 4-year follow-up is higher in DB group ( p = 0.035). Denosumab is a safe but costly alternative to zoledronic acid for treatment of surgically unsalvageable GCTB.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212137422000318; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbo.2022.100441; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85133480209&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35800292; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2212137422000318; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbo.2022.100441
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know