Neptunium(V) sorption to goethite at attomolar to micromolar concentrations
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, ISSN: 0021-9797, Vol: 390, Issue: 1, Page: 176-182
2013
- 13Citations
- 27Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Sorption of 10 −18 –10 −5 M neptunium (Np) to goethite was examined using liquid scintillation counting and gamma spectroscopy. A combination approach using 239 Np and long lived 237 Np was employed to span this wide concentration range. 239 Np detection limits were determined to be 2 × 10 −18 M and 3 × 10 −17 M for liquid scintillation counting and gamma spectroscopy, respectively. Sorption was found to be linear below 10 −11 M, in contrast to the non-linear behavior observed at higher concentrations both here and in the literature. 2-site and 3-site Langmuir models were used to simulate sorption behavior over the entire 10 −18 –10 −5 M range. The 3-site model fit yielded Type I and II site densities of 3.56 sites/nm 2 (99.6%) and 0.014 ± 0.007 sites/nm 2 (0.4 ± 0.1%), consistent with typical “high affinity” and “low affinity” sites reported in the literature [21]. Modeling results for both models suggest that sorption below ∼10 −11 M is controlled by a third (Type III) site with a density on the order of ∼7 × 10 −5 sites/nm 2 (∼0.002%). While the nature of this “site” cannot be determined from isotherm data alone, the sorption data at ultra-low Np concentrations indicate that Np(V) sorption to goethite at environmentally relevant concentrations will be (1) linear and (2) higher than previous (high concentration) laboratory experiments suggest.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021979712009927; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2012.08.058; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84868477003&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23079039; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0021979712009927; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2012.08.058
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know