Sustainability of dairy and soy processing: A review on wastewater recycling
Journal of Cleaner Production, ISSN: 0959-6526, Vol: 237, Page: 117821
2019
- 135Citations
- 294Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Review Description
Dairy and soy products are two of the most common sources of protein in the human diet. Both industries produce large volumes of wastewater (up to 10 L L −1 raw material), high treatment costs as high as 130 and 3374 US$/meter cubic of effluent treated for soy and dairy, respectively. The biological oxygen demand reaches 6.8 and 48 g L −1, while the chemical oxygen demand reaches 12 and 95 g L −1 for soy and dairy, respectively. Governments are encouraging research on circular economy. The goal is to minimize water loss and upcycle by-products by recycling wastewater. We deemed as important a review comparing recent technologies for circular economy of dairy and soy wastewater. Purification treatments range from physicochemical (flotation and coagulation) to biological (anaerobic, sludge and membrane). Treatments range from ultrafiltration, coagulation-flocculation and foam fractionation (physicochemical) to sludge and filters (biological). While irrigation with dairy wastewater increases eutrophication of soil and water, soy products wastewater can be a valuable source of protein, oligosaccharides, phytochemicals and minerals. In addition, soy wastewater has potential as texturiser (foaming agent, emulsifier and thickener) and food ingredient in new beverage development.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652619326812; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117821; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85069924379&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0959652619326812; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117821
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know